সোমবার, ২২ জুলাই, ২০১৩

Distinguish between joint product and by-product. Describe two methods to account for by-product.



Joint products
The accounting classification of products created from the same manufacturing process into joint products.
Are when two or more products are produced or separated in the course of processing, each having a sufficiently high saleable value.
Joint products are produced simultaneously, however, in contract.                                      
 Ex-In the petroleum industry, petrol and paraffin are produced. Each have similar sales value and are the main products.
                   
By-products
By-products depends upon the relative importance to the overall production system of good and the products respective value.
Are outputs of some value produced incidentally in manufacturing something else.
By-products are produced incidentally during the production of the main product.
Ex-In the timber industry, by products like sawdust and bark are secondary products. Each have low sales value compared to timber.
This could be determined by looking at the overall goal of the manufacturing process and then use to determine if something is a joint product or a by-product of the process.
Two methods to account for by-product are follows:
Activity-Based Costing and Relevant Costs:
Activity-based costing is a resource consumption model, not a spending model. Activity-based costing gives an idea of the magnitude of resources involved in carrying out activities, but it should be used with a great deal of caution in making particular decisions. The costs assigned to products and other cost objects are only potentially relevant costs. Whether they are relevant or not in any particular situation should be carefully considered.
For example, in most activity-based costing systems the fixed depreciation costs of a sophisticated milling machine would be allocated to products based upon their usage of that resource. Suppose you are trying to decide whether to drop a product that uses the milling machine. The fact that the product uses the milling machine is relevant only if the milling machine is a bottleneck (and opportunity costs are involved in its use) or somehow future cash flows associated with the machine will be affected by how much it is used. If the machine is not a bottleneck and using some of its excess capacity has no effect on future spending, then there really is no cost associated with using the machine. In this case, the costs assigned by the activity-based costing system to the product would not be relevant.

কোন মন্তব্য নেই:

একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন